Screener
TMFX vs TMFS
Motley Fool Next Index ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- TMFX costs 0.35% less per year.
- TMFX follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFX | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $64M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.05% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.4% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.77% | 19.56% |
| Max drawdown | -34.30% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFX and TMFS
Explore further