Screener
TNA vs AMZU
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
Key differences
- AMZU costs 0.06% less per year.
- TNA is significantly larger than AMZU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AMZU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TNA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TNA | AMZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.05% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $436M |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 4.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +130.8% | +44.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.7% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.15% | 59.05% |
| Max drawdown | -88.09% | -55.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TNA and AMZU
Explore further