Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TRFM vs AOR

AAM Transformers ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

TRFM

AAM Transformers ETF

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$213M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

Key differences

TRFM is an equity ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and AOR 0.15%.

  • TRFM is an equity fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; AOR uses active selection.
  • AOR costs 0.34% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than TRFM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, TRFM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TRFMAOR
Annual cost (TER)0.49%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$213M$3.6B
Since20222008
Dividend yield0.13%2.47%
Asset classequitymixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+42.5%+16.8%
CAGR 3Y+29.6%+14.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.031.07
Volatility 1Y23.37%8.66%
Max drawdown-28.40%-22.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to TRFM and AOR