Screener
TRFM vs CCOR
AAM Transformers ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
TRFM is an equity ETF, while CCOR is an alternative ETF. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and CCOR 1.29%.
- TRFM is an equity fund, while CCOR is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- TRFM costs 0.80% less per year.
- TRFM is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, TRFM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRFM | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213M | $27M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.6% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | -0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.37% | 7.10% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.