Screener
TRFM vs CGGO
AAM Transformers ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
Both TRFM and CGGO are equity ETFs. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and CGGO 0.47%. The main difference: TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- TRFM covers North America; CGGO covers global markets.
- CGGO is much larger than TRFM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, TRFM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRFM | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213M | $11.4B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.6% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.37% | 17.47% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -24.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.