Screener
TRFM vs HCOW
AAM Transformers ETF vs Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Key differences
TRFM is an equity ETF, while HCOW is an alternative ETF. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and HCOW 0.65%.
- TRFM is an equity fund, while HCOW is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; HCOW uses option income.
- TRFM costs 0.16% less per year.
- TRFM is much larger than HCOW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRFM | HCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213M | $17M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 11.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.37% | 13.86% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -24.15% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.