Screener
TRFM vs SPDF
AAM Transformers ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
Both TRFM and SPDF are equity ETFs. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and SPDF 0.69%. The main difference: TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; SPDF uses active selection.
- TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; SPDF uses active selection.
- TRFM costs 0.20% less per year.
- TRFM is much larger than SPDF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRFM | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213M | $18M |
| Since | 2022 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.37% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -2.77% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.