Screener
TRUC vs SMH
VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- TRUC costs 0.21% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than TRUC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TRUC follows a active selection strategy; SMH uses index tracking.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $41M | $58.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +139.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +65.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +38.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 30.31% |
| Max drawdown | -10.61% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUC and SMH
Explore further