Screener
TRUF vs SMH
Vaneck Financials TruSector ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- TRUF costs 0.25% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than TRUF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TRUF follows a active selection strategy; SMH uses index tracking.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUF | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $58.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +151.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +65.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +39.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 30.57% |
| Max drawdown | -3.06% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUF and SMH
Explore further