Screener
TRUH vs BMED
Vaneck Healthcare TruSector ETF vs iShares Health Innovation Active ETF
Key differences
- TRUH costs 0.45% less per year.
- BMED is significantly larger than TRUH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BMED has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUH | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $10M |
| Since | 2026 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.93% |
| Max drawdown | -4.52% | -36.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUH and BMED
Explore further