Screener
TRUH vs PINK
Vaneck Healthcare TruSector ETF vs Simplify Health Care ETF
Key differences
- TRUH costs 0.41% less per year.
- PINK is significantly larger than TRUH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TRUH follows a active selection strategy; PINK uses index tracking.
- PINK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUH | PINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $241M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.04% |
| Max drawdown | -4.52% | -18.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUH and PINK
Explore further