Screener
TRUH vs XHS
Vaneck Healthcare TruSector ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
Key differences
- TRUH costs 0.25% less per year.
- XHS is significantly larger than TRUH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TRUH follows a active selection strategy; XHS uses index tracking.
- XHS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUH | XHS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $98M |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -4.52% | -39.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUH and XHS
Explore further