Skip to content
Screener

TTT vs SH

ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury vs ProShares Short S&P500

TTT

ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$19M

SH

ProShares Short S&P500

Annual cost

0.89%

Fund size

$981M

Key differences

TTT is a fixed income ETF, while SH is an equity ETF. TTT charges 0.95% a year and SH 0.89%.

  • TTT is a fixed income fund, while SH is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • TTT follows a leveraged strategy; SH uses inverse.
  • SH costs 0.06% less per year.
  • SH is much larger than TTT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, TTT has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TTTSH
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.89%
Fund size (AUM)$19M$981M
Since20122006
Dividend yield8.74%4.52%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y+0.5%-16.1%
CAGR 3Y+12.0%-12.8%
CAGR 5Y+17.1%-8.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.39-1.10
Volatility 1Y28.91%12.09%
Max drawdown-81.76%-76.12%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to TTT and SH