Screener
TUA vs ICSH
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.17% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than TUA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUA is classified as alternative, while ICSH is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUA | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $802M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.8% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.2% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.58 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.85% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -15.85% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUA and ICSH
Explore further