Screener
TUA vs RHRX
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
TUA is a fixed income ETF, while RHRX is an alternative ETF. TUA charges 0.25% a year and RHRX 1.38%.
- TUA is a fixed income fund, while RHRX is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TUA follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- TUA costs 1.13% less per year.
- TUA is much larger than RHRX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUA | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $757M | $36M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.53% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.9% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -0.5% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.84% | 13.75% |
| Max drawdown | -15.85% | -25.33% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.