Screener
TUA vs UTWY
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF vs F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
Key differences
- UTWY costs 0.10% less per year.
- TUA is significantly larger than UTWY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUA is classified as alternative, while UTWY is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- TUA follows a active selection strategy; UTWY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, UTWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUA | UTWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $802M | $8M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 5.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.2% | -1.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.58 | -0.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.85% | 8.22% |
| Max drawdown | -15.85% | -18.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUA and UTWY
Explore further