Screener
TUG vs FDRS
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.16% less per year.
- TUG is classified as mixed asset, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TUG follows a active selection strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUG | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $77M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.14% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -21.64% |
Similar to TUG and FDRS
Explore further