Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TUG vs RHTX

STF Tactical Growth ETF vs RH Tactical Outlook ETF

TUG

STF Tactical Growth ETF

STFM

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$42M

RHTX

RH Tactical Outlook ETF

Adaptive ETF

Annual cost

1.51%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • TUG costs 0.86% less per year.
  • TUG is significantly larger than RHTX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • TUG covers north america markets; RHTX covers global.
  • Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RHTX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TUGRHTX
Annual cost (TER)0.65%1.51%
Fund size (AUM)$42M$9M
Since20222012
Dividend yield0.58%0.00%
Asset classmixed assetmixed asset
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+38.4%+26.2%
CAGR 3Y+24.5%+16.1%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.060.81
Volatility 1Y16.15%15.10%
Max drawdown-22.27%-24.68%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TUG and RHTX