Screener
TUGN vs DYTA
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.67% less per year.
- TUGN is classified as alternative, while DYTA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- TUGN follows a option income strategy; DYTA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUGN | DYTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $96M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 11.46% | 1.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.7% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.1% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.38% | 9.63% |
| Max drawdown | -23.45% | -9.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUGN and DYTA
Explore further