Skip to content
Screener

TUGN vs KAT

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs Scharf ETF

TUGN

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$78M

KAT

Scharf ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$682M

Key differences

TUGN is an alternative ETF, while KAT is an equity ETF. TUGN charges 0.65% a year and KAT 0.75%.

  • TUGN is an alternative fund, while KAT is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • TUGN follows a option income strategy; KAT uses active selection.
  • TUGN costs 0.10% less per year.
  • KAT is much larger than TUGN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TUGNKAT
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$78M$682M
Since20222011
Dividend yield10.59%0.39%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+31.5%N/A
CAGR 3Y+21.8%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.98N/A
Volatility 1Y16.24%
Max drawdown-23.45%-9.25%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to TUGN and KAT