Screener
TURF vs TACU
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF vs T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- TACU costs 0.44% less per year.
- TURF is significantly larger than TACU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TURF follows a active selection strategy; TACU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| TURF | TACU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $14M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -6.84% | -8.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TURF and TACU
Explore further