Screener
TXUG vs TAOZ
Thornburg International Growth ETF vs Thornburg American Opportunities Fund ETF Class
Key differences
- TXUG costs 0.09% less per year.
- TAOZ is significantly larger than TXUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TXUG is classified as equity, while TAOZ is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- TXUG covers global markets; TAOZ covers north america.
- TXUG follows a index tracking strategy; TAOZ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| TXUG | TAOZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $490M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | — |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.58% | -3.85% |
Similar to TXUG and TAOZ
Explore further