Screener
TYLD vs CRUX
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CRUX costs 0.27% less per year.
- CRUX is significantly larger than TYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TYLD | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.71% | 4.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.75% | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.06% | -1.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TYLD and CRUX
Explore further