Screener
TYLD vs FCOR
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF vs Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- FCOR costs 0.23% less per year.
- FCOR is significantly larger than TYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TYLD follows a active selection strategy; FCOR uses index tracking.
- FCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TYLD | FCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $339M |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.71% | 4.55% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.75% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -1.06% | -22.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TYLD and FCOR
Explore further