Screener
TYLD vs GVAL
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF vs Cambria Global Value ETF
Key differences
- TYLD costs 0.07% less per year.
- GVAL is significantly larger than TYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TYLD is classified as fixed income, while GVAL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TYLD | GVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $541M |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.71% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +37.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.75% | 14.47% |
| Max drawdown | -1.06% | -47.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TYLD and GVAL
Explore further