Screener
UBRL vs CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
Key differences
- CONL costs 0.11% less per year.
- CONL is significantly larger than UBRL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UBRL is classified as equity, while CONL is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| UBRL | CONL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 1.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $582M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 13.28% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -45.2% | -73.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 64.48% | 138.51% |
| Max drawdown | -56.25% | -93.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UBRL and CONL
Explore further