Screener
UBRL vs TLA
GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF vs Graniteshares Autocallable Tsla ETF
Key differences
- TLA costs 0.08% less per year.
- UBRL is significantly larger than TLA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UBRL is classified as equity, while TLA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- UBRL follows a leveraged strategy; TLA uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| UBRL | TLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $1M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 13.28% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -45.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 64.48% | — |
| Max drawdown | -56.25% | -5.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UBRL and TLA
Explore further