Screener
UCC vs RXI
ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary vs iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- RXI costs 0.56% less per year.
- RXI is significantly larger than UCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UCC follows a leveraged strategy; RXI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, UCC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UCC | RXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $268M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.2% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +12.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.21% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -61.76% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UCC and RXI
Explore further