Screener
UCC vs XLY
ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary vs State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLY costs 0.87% less per year.
- XLY is significantly larger than UCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UCC follows a leveraged strategy; XLY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, UCC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UCC | XLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $23.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 0.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.2% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.21% | 18.18% |
| Max drawdown | -61.76% | -39.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UCC and XLY
Explore further