Screener
UDIV vs GEND
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- UDIV costs 0.32% less per year.
- UDIV is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UDIV is classified as equity, while GEND is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- UDIV follows a index tracking strategy; GEND uses option income.
- UDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UDIV | GEND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $121M | $4M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.7% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.36 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 10.70% |
| Max drawdown | -35.21% | -6.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UDIV and GEND
Explore further