Screener
UEVM vs IFLO
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF vs VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
Key differences
- UEVM costs 0.11% less per year.
- UEVM covers emerging markets markets; IFLO covers global.
- UEVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UEVM | IFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $250M | $168M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.47% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.93% | — |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UEVM and IFLO
Explore further