Screener
UGA vs UNG
United States Gasoline Fund, LP vs United States Natural Gas Fund, LP
Key differences
- UGA costs 0.09% less per year.
- UNG is significantly larger than UGA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, UGA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UGA | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.08% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $138M | $533M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | commodity | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +77.7% | -33.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | -27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +25.9% | -23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | -0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.13% | 60.76% |
| Max drawdown | -75.89% | -93.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UGA and UNG
Explore further