Screener
ULE vs BITI
ProShares Ultra Euro vs ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
Key differences
- BITI is significantly larger than ULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ULE is classified as currency, while BITI is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- ULE follows a leveraged strategy; BITI uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, ULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ULE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULE | BITI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $187M |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 9.25% |
| Asset class | currency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.1% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | -37.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | -0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.75% | 43.05% |
| Max drawdown | -51.30% | -92.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULE and BITI
Explore further