Screener
ULST vs ICSH
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.12% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than ULST — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ULST follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULST | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $600M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 3.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.66% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -6.20% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULST and ICSH
Explore further