Screener
ULST vs PSDM
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF vs PGIM Short Duration Multi-Secto
Key differences
- ULST costs 0.20% less per year.
- ULST is significantly larger than PSDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ULST follows a index tracking strategy; PSDM uses active selection.
- ULST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULST | PSDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $600M | $185M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 4.81% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.66% | 1.69% |
| Max drawdown | -6.20% | -1.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULST and PSDM
Explore further