Screener
ULST vs SCHQ
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.17% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, ULST has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ULST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULST | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $600M | $897M |
| Since | 2013 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | -5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | -0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.66% | 9.07% |
| Max drawdown | -6.20% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULST and SCHQ
Explore further