Screener
ULST vs SCUS
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF vs Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
Key differences
- SCUS costs 0.06% less per year.
- ULST follows a index tracking strategy; SCUS uses active selection.
- ULST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULST | SCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $600M | $224M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.66% | 0.66% |
| Max drawdown | -6.20% | -0.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULST and SCUS
Explore further