Screener
UNG vs UGA
United States Natural Gas Fund, LP vs United States Gasoline Fund, LP
Key differences
- UGA costs 0.09% less per year.
- UNG is significantly larger than UGA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, UGA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UNG | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $533M | $138M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | commodity | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -33.6% | +77.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -27.9% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -23.5% | +25.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.32 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 60.76% | 35.13% |
| Max drawdown | -93.55% | -75.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UNG and UGA
Explore further