Screener
UPV vs EFZ
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe vs ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- UPV follows a leveraged strategy; EFZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, UPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UPV | EFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $16M |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.14% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.9% | -15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | -9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.82% | 16.44% |
| Max drawdown | -67.25% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UPV and EFZ
Explore further