Screener
URA vs RSSL
Global X Uranium ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.61% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than RSSL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | 19.27% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and RSSL
Explore further