Screener
URNM vs SGDM
Sprott Uranium Miners Etf vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.29% less per year.
- URNM is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URNM follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SGDM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SGDM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URNM | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $660M |
| Since | 2019 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.1% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.0% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 51.03% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -50.78% | -49.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URNM and SGDM
Explore further