Screener
URTH vs ACWI
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.08% less per year.
- ACWI is significantly larger than URTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $31.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 12.84% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -33.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and ACWI
Explore further