Screener
URTH vs IOO
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.16% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $8.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +40.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.1% | +16.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and IOO
Explore further