Screener
USCA vs SNPG
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF vs Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF
Key differences
- USCA costs 0.08% less per year.
- USCA is significantly larger than SNPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SNPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| USCA | SNPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $15M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.20% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -19.14% | -21.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to USCA and SNPG
Explore further