Screener
USMF vs WTV
WisdomTree U.S. Multifactor Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
Key differences
- WTV costs 0.16% less per year.
- WTV is significantly larger than USMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- USMF follows a index tracking strategy; WTV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, WTV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- WTV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| USMF | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $358M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.86% | 11.94% |
| Max drawdown | -36.24% | -42.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to USMF and WTV
Explore further