Screener
VB vs XSLV
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- VB costs 0.22% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than XSLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VB | XSLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $177.4B | $242M |
| Since | 2004 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 13.20% |
| Max drawdown | -42.05% | -44.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VB and XSLV
Explore further