Screener
VBK vs TMFS
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- VBK costs 0.80% less per year.
- VBK is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VBK follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VBK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VBK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VBK | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42.8B | $64M |
| Since | 2004 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.6% | +0.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | -0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.28% | 19.64% |
| Max drawdown | -38.70% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VBK and TMFS
Explore further