Screener
VCR vs RTH
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund ETF Shares vs VanEck Retail ETF
Key differences
- VCR costs 0.26% less per year.
- VCR is significantly larger than RTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VCR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VCR | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.1B | $265M |
| Since | 2004 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.73% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.2% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.55% | 11.81% |
| Max drawdown | -39.20% | -25.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VCR and RTH
Explore further