Screener
VFMF vs OMFS
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF Shares vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- VFMF costs 0.21% less per year.
- VFMF follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, VFMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFMF | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $601M | $275M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -41.34% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFMF and OMFS
Explore further