Screener
VFMV vs VONV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VONV costs 0.07% less per year.
- VONV is significantly larger than VFMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VONV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VONV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFMV | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $421M | $20.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.94% | 1.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | 10.92% |
| Max drawdown | -33.64% | -38.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFMV and VONV
Explore further